Rubí and Peter Hänggi of the University of Augsburg, Germany, led a team that has developed a new approach to these ratchet sorters. They start with a mathematical framework in which the entropy of the system is treated like potential energy, with entropy “barriers” that repel particles. These are regions where particles are restricted to a small space, which reduces the number of states (locations and velocities) that a particle can occupy. Fewer states means lower entropy. Like balls rolling down a hill, particles tend to move away from these low entropy spots.
The team applies this formalism to a tube with walls that periodically ramp from a narrow diameter to a wide diameter and back, with an asymmetric or “sawtooth” profile. This shape forms distinct but still connected chambers, or segments, each of which is a few microns long. Entropic barriers inhibit travel between segments; however, the barriers are steeper going to the left, so the net motion of the particles is to the right.
In order to clearly see the entropic effect in their computer simulation and analytical calculations, the researchers apply an oscillating force that essentially shakes the particles back and forth inside the tube. In a real experiment, this force could be an oscillating electric field.
The supreme task of the physicist is to arrive at those universal elementary laws from which the cosmos can be built up by pure deduction. There is no logical path to these laws; only intuition, resting on sympathetic understanding of experience, can reach them
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Separation device
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Vitrification vs. Crystalization

The most basic difference between the glass forming (vitrification) process and the crystallization may be seen in the figure on the left. Vitrification is actually not really a transition , because it does not involve any genuinely singular behaviors, in contrast with crystallization. A very likely implication is that, vitrification should not be due to a critical mode that features long-range correlations. Its dynamics should be essentially local, like what happens to a traffic congestion.


Wednesday, October 19, 2011
thermodynamic zeroth law
A system in equilibrium is characterized by a few intensive parameters such as temperature and chemical potential. The zeroth law of thermodynamics implies that when two systems can exchange a conserved, extensive property (e.g., molecules), their intensive parameters (e.g., the chemical potentials) must eventually equalize.
Do such parameters exist for far-from-equilibrium systems? We know that intensive thermodynamic parameters can be defined for nonequilibrium stationary states in systems with short-range spatial correlations. To test whether this is possible in the presence of long-range correlations, often found in such stationary states, Punyabrata Pradhan and colleagues at the University of Stuttgart, Germany, writing in Physical Review E, analyze the driven lattice gas (DLG), a favorite “toy model” of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, in which particles with short-range interactions hop around on a lattice.
Suppose a DLG, characterized by its size, interparticle interactions, and bias, is placed in contact with an equilibrium lattice gas. Eventually the particle densities of the two gases attain two different stationary values. Consider a second DLG, with different properties, that “equilibrates” via contact with a copy of the equilibrium lattice gas used in the first experiment. If stationary contact between the two systems can indeed be characterized by an intensive variable, we should expect no change in the respective particle densities of the two DLGs while in contact. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors verify that the densities, upon contact, indeed remain nearly unchanged, but that there are deviations from the zeroth law, which can be largely understood in terms of an excess chemical potential associated with the contact region. – Ron Dickman
Friday, July 22, 2011
Smectic Coexisting with nematic in cuprate
Coupling to the smectic fields can then occur either through phase or amplitude fluctuations of the smectic. Here, we focus on the former, which means thatcouples to local shifts of the wave vectors
and
. Replacing the gradient in the x direction by a covariant-derivative-like coupling gives
(4)and similarly for the gradient in the y direction, to yield a GL term coupling the nematic to smectic states. The vector
represents by how much the wave vector,
, is shifted for a given fluctuation
. Hence, we propose a GL functional (for modulations along
) based on symmetry principles and
and
being small:
(5)where … refers to terms we can neglect for the present purpose (SOM d). If we were to replace
by
where
is the electromagnetic vector potential, Eq. 5 becomes the GL free energy of a superconductor; its minimization in the long-distance limit yields
and thus quantization of its associated magnetic flux (22, 23). Analogously, minimization of Eq. 5 implies
surrounding each topological defect (SOM e). Here, the vector
is proportional to
and lies along the line where
= 0. The resulting key prediction is that
will vanish along the line in the direction of
that passes through the core of the topological defect, with
becoming greater on one side and less on the other (Fig. 4B). Additional coupling to the smectic amplitude can shift the location of the topological defect away from the line of
= 0 (SOM e).
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Heat Flow In Small Things
Advances in the fabrication and characterization of nanoscale systems now allow for a better understanding of one of the most basic issues in science and technology: the flow of heat at the microscopic level. In this Colloquium recent advances are surveyed and an understanding of physical mechanisms of energy transport in nanostructures is presented, focusing mainly on molecular junctions and atomic wires. Basic issues are examined such as thermal conductivity, thermoelectricity, local temperature and heating, and the relation between heat current density
and temperature gradient—known as Fourier’s law. Both theoretical and experimental progress are critically reported in each of these issues and future research opportunities in the field are discussed. [REVIEW OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 83, JANUARY–MARCH 2011]
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Metastable states are important in reality
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Remarks on phase transitions
Saturday, April 2, 2011
More on the pseudogap in cuprate
What does this imply ?
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Why does it grow in the observed way ?
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Mpemba Effect


Water is just mundane and seems well-understood in many respects. However, there are still quite a lot of things that motivate people to find more. For example, how water molecules arrange themselves when they adsorbed on an adsorbate. Another instance is, I think more associated with the thermodynamics of water: it has been claimed that, hot water cools faster than cold water when they are placed in the same chamber. This was named after its discoverer, a middle school student Mpemba. There came a latest study on this [http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.2684.pdf]:
In this paper we have presented data confirming that water initially at higher temperature cools at a faster rate than water initially at a lower temperature and that this trend continues past the point at which the two samples reach the same temperature: the crossover temperature. Furthermore, our data indicates that the starting temperature affects the crossover temperature in a reproducible manner. We have confirmed that warmer water indeed cools faster than colder water and that, surprisingly, this trend continues past the point where the temperatures of the two samples are the same. Our results show that when using optimal initial temperature conditions, the crossover temperature is found to be 2.7 oC whereas our other set of initial conditions gave a crossover temperature of -0.07 oC. These data taken together provide a definite quantitative evidence of the Mpemba effect.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Negative specific heat
[1]PRL 105, 010601 (2010)
Monday, January 25, 2010
Critical Casirmir effect
Sticky situations
Illustration: A. Gambassi et al., Phys. Rev. E (2009)
Critical Casimir effect in classical binary liquid mixtures
A. Gambassi, A. Maciołek, C. Hertlein, U. Nellen, L. Helden, C. Bechinger, and S. Dietrich
Phys. Rev. E 80, 061143 (Published December 31, 2009)
ShareThis Statistical Mechanics Soft Matter
When two conducting plates are brought in close proximity to one another, vacuum fluctuations in the electromagnetic field between them create a pressure. This effective force, known as the Casimir effect, has a thermodynamic analog: the “critical Casimir effect.” In this case, thermal fluctuations of a local order parameter (such as density) near a continuous phase transition can attract or repel nearby objects when they are in confinement.
In 2008, a team of scientists in Germany presented direct experimental evidence for the critical Casimir effect by measuring the femtonewton forces that develop between a colloidal sphere and a flat silica surface when both are immersed in a liquid near a critical point [1]. Now, writing in Physical Review E, Andrea Gambassi, now at SISSA in Trieste, Italy, and collaborators at the Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, the University of Stuttgart, and the Polish Academy of Sciences, follow up on this seminal experiment and present a comprehensive examination of their experimental results and theory for the critical Casimir effect.
Success in fabricating MEMS and NEMS (micro- and nanoelectromechanical systems) made it possible to explore facets of the quantum Casimir effect that had for many years only been theoretical curiosities. With the availability of tools to track and measure the minute forces between particles in suspension, scientists are able to do the same with the critical Casimir effect. In fact, it may be possible to tune this thermodynamically driven force in small-scale devices so it offsets the attractive (and potentially damaging) force associated with the quantum Casimir effect. Given its detail, Gambassi et al.’s paper may well become standard reading in this emerging field. – Jessica Thomas
[1] C. Hertlein et al., Nature 451, 172 (2008).