What is the standard model ?

The standard model, as it is usually called, tries to encompass all possible interactions including production and annihilation of somewhat elusive elementary particles that are supposed to partly make up the universe. The following quantity explains it without words:

Smectic Coexisting with nematic in cuprate

In the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors, incredibly rich and exotic things have been observed, among which are the checkerboard pattern that breaks the C4v symmetry within an unit cell and the stripes that break an additional translational symmetry. These are called electronic nematic and smectic phases, respectively. According to this study, there should be an interesting interplay between the two on cuprates, due to topological defects. The authors formalize the coupling in a gauge invariant way.

Coupling to the smectic fields can then occur either through phase or amplitude fluctuations of the smectic. Here, we focus on the former, which means that couples to local shifts of the wave vectors and . Replacing the gradient in the x direction by a covariant-derivative-like coupling gives(4)and similarly for the gradient in the y direction, to yield a GL term coupling the nematic to smectic states. The vector represents by how much the wave vector, , is shifted for a given fluctuation. Hence, we propose a GL functional (for modulations along ) based on symmetry principles and and being small:(5)where … refers to terms we can neglect for the present purpose (SOM d). If we were to replace by where is the electromagnetic vector potential, Eq. 5 becomes the GL free energy of a superconductor; its minimization in the long-distance limit yields and thus quantization of its associated magnetic flux (22, 23). Analogously, minimization of Eq. 5 implies surrounding each topological defect (SOM e). Here, the vector is proportional to and lies along the line where = 0. The resulting key prediction is that will vanish along the line in the direction of that passes through the core of the topological defect, with becoming greater on one side and less on the other (Fig. 4B). Additional coupling to the smectic amplitude can shift the location of the topological defect away from the line of = 0 (SOM e).

Vacuum friction

Can the vacuum drag a spinning objects ? Considering the famous Casimir effect, the answer is a definite yes. This recent study calculated this dragging force in a full quantum way and shows that it is experimentally detectable. Let's see if new experiments will come out soon !

We study the stopping of spinning particles in vacuum. A torque is produced by fluctuations of the vacuum electromagnetic field and the particle polarization. Expressions for the frictional torque and the power radiated by the particle are obtained as a function of rotation velocity and the temperatures of the particle and the surrounding vacuum. We solve this problem following two different approaches: (i) a semiclassical calculation based upon the fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT), and (ii) a fully quantum-mechanical theory within the framework of quantum electrodynamics, assuming that the response of the particle is governed by bosonic excitations such as phonons and plasmons. Both calculations lead to identical final expressions, thus confirming the suitability of the FDT to deal with problems that are apparently out of equilibrium, and also providing comprehensive insight into the physical processes underlying thermal and vacuum friction.We adapt the quantum-mechanical theory to describe particles whose electromagnetic response is produced by fermionic excitations. Furthermore, we extend our FDT formalism to fully account for magnetic polarization, which dominates friction when the particle is a good conductor. Finally, we present numerically calculated torques and stopping times for the relevant cases of graphite and gold nanoparticles. [PHYSICAL REVIEW A 82, 063827 (2010)]

Curved space acts as gauge field in graphene

a, Distortion of a graphene disc which is required to generate uniform B_S. The original shape is shown in blue. b, Orientation of the graphene crystal lattice with respect to the strain. Graphene is stretched or compressed along equivalent crystallographic directions 100. Two graphene sublattices are shown in red and green. c, Distribution of the forces applied at the disc’s perimeter (arrows) that would create the strain required in a. The uniform colour inside the disc indicates strictly uniform pseudomagnetic field. d, The shown shape allows uniform B_S to be generated only by normal forces applied at the sample’s perimeter. The length of the arrows indicates the required local stress.

Among many remarkable qualities of graphene, its electronic properties attract particular interest owing to the chiral character of the charge carriers, which leads to such unusual phenomena as metallic conductivity in the limit of no carriers and the half-integer quantum Hall effect observable even at room temperature^{1, 2, 3}. Because graphene is only one atom thick, it is also amenable to external influences, including mechanical deformation. The latter offers a tempting prospect of controlling graphene’s properties by strain and, recently, several reports have examined graphene under uniaxial deformation^{4, 5, 6, 7, 8}. Although the strain can induce additional Raman features^{7, 8}, no significant changes in graphene’s band structure have been either observed or expected for realistic strains of up to ~15% (refs 9, 10, 11). Here we show that a designed strain aligned along three main crystallographic directions induces strong gauge fields^{12, 13, 14} that effectively act as a uniform magnetic field exceeding 10 T. For a finite doping, the quantizing field results in an insulating bulk and a pair of countercirculating edge states, similar to the case of a topological insulator^{15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20}. We suggest realistic ways of creating this quantum state and observing the pseudomagnetic quantum Hall effect. We also show that strained superlattices can be used to open significant energy gaps in graphene’s electronic spectrum.