High-TC superconductors have layered crystal structures, where TC depends on bond lengths, ionic valences, and Coulomb coupling between electronic bands in adjacent, spatially separated layers. Analysis of 31 high-TC materials—cuprates, ruthenates, rutheno-cuprates, iron pnictides and organics—has revealed that the optimal transition temperature TCO is given by the universal expression kB-1e2Λ / ℓζ. Here, ℓ is the spacing between interacting charges within the layers, ζ is the distance between interacting layers, Λ is a universal constant, equal to about twice the reduced electron Compton wavelength, kB is Boltzmann's constant and e is the elementary charge. Non-optimum compounds in which sample degradation is evident typically exhibit TC below TCO. Figure 1 shows TCO versus (ση/A)1/2/ζ—a theoretical expression determining 1 / ℓζ, where σ is the charge fraction, η is the layer number count and A is the formulaic area. The diagonal black line represents the theoretical TCO. Coloured data points falling within ± 1.4 K of the line constitute validation of the theory.
The elemental building block of high-TC superconductors comprises two adjacent and spatially separated charge layers. The factor e2 / ℓζ, determining TCO arises from Coulomb forces between them. Remarkably an explicit dependence on phonons, plasmons, magnetism, spins, band structure, effective masses, Fermi-surface topologies and pairing-state symmetries in high-TC materials is absent. The magnitude of Λ suggests a universal role of Compton scattering in high-TC superconductivity, as illustrated in figure 2 that considers pairing of carriers (h) mediated by electronic excitation (e) via virtual photons (ν). Several other important predictions are given. A conducting charge sheet is non-superconducting without a second mediating charge layer next to it, and a charge structure representing a room-temperature superconductor yet to be discovered is presented.
The supreme task of the physicist is to arrive at those universal elementary laws from which the cosmos can be built up by pure deduction. There is no logical path to these laws; only intuition, resting on sympathetic understanding of experience, can reach them
Showing posts with label pnictides. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pnictides. Show all posts
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Another simple and universal role in high Tc ?
These authors presented a very simple rule that seems validated by their analysis of experimental data [J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23 (2011) 295701 (17pp)]. In this rule, the Tc of optimal compounds is essentially set by two length scales and the electron charge, i.e., Tc~e^2/l\times l'. What is striking is that, this rue was argued to cover a wide range of materials, including cuprates, pnictides and ruthenates. They proposed a paring mechanism via Compton scattering: e.g., the holes in the conducting layer is scattered by the electrons in the charge reservoir layer. Instead of forming excitons, superfluid forms. The following is a brief sojourn over this work [http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/labtalk-article/46706]:
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Manifesto for higher Tc
A perspective by A.V.Chubukov, who is an enthusiast of spin-fluctuation type gluon. He compared the iron-based and the copper-based superconductors and surmise a higher Tc, observing
(1)Kexp/KLDA for existing high Tc SCs is around 0.5;
(2)superfluid density ~ dc conductivity x Tc.
Point (1) indicates that, high Tc is likely with a mixture of mobility and localization [Nature Physics, 7:272(2011)].
(1)Kexp/KLDA for existing high Tc SCs is around 0.5;
(2)superfluid density ~ dc conductivity x Tc.
Point (1) indicates that, high Tc is likely with a mixture of mobility and localization [Nature Physics, 7:272(2011)].
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
double exchange relevant for High Tc superconductivity
Last year there published a paper [Hai-Yao Deng 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 075702] in which a model was proposed to address the issues regarding the coexistence of Zhang-Rice singlet formation and the spin glass at very low doping in cuprates. This model contains not only itinerant charges but also localized spins. There is strong on-site anti-ferromagnetic coupling between them. This coupling is held responsible for the formation of ZRS and the formation of spin glass, as a result of double exchange. Now there came very latest studies [Phys. Rev. B 82, 045125 (2010);Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 107004 (2010)] that held similar ideas in solving puzzles residing in iron-based pnictides. This should not be regarded as a simple coincidence. It may strengthen the idea that, high Tc SC is intimately connected with magnetic fluctuations. More likely, this model may serve as a unification for High Tc superconductors of both iron-based and copper-based.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)