Neutrino oscillations, observed through the transmutation of neutrinos of one type into neutrinos of another type, occur if there is mixing between neutrino types and if individual neutrino types consist of a linear combination of different neutrino masses. (At present, the masses and mixings of the fundamental quarks and leptons can be measured but are not fully understood.) In the case of two-neutrino mixing — for example, mixing between the muon neutrino and the electron neutrino — the probability (P) that a muon neutrino (νμ) will oscillate into an electron neutrino (νe) is given by P(νμ νe) = sin2(2θ)sin2(1.27Δm2L/E). Here, θ, in radians, describes the mixing between the muon neutrino and electron neutrino; Δm2 is the difference of the squares of the masses of the two neutrinos in square electronvolts; L is the distance travelled by the muon neutrino in kilometres; and E is the muon-neutrino energy in gigaelectronvolts.
In general, the number of different neutrino masses equals the number of neutrino types, so that three-neutrino mixing involves three neutrino masses and two independent Δm2 values, whereas five-neutrino mixing involves five neutrino masses and four independent Δm2 values. Neutrino oscillations have been observed at a Δm2 of about 7 × 10−5 eV2 by detectors that measure the flow of neutrinos from the Sun and experiments that detect neutrinos at a long distance from nuclear reactors. The oscillations have been detected at a Δm2 of around 2 × 10−3 eV2 by detectors that measure the flow of neutrinos from the atmosphere and by experiments in which neutrinos are measured at a long distance from particle accelerators. In addition to these confirmed observations of neutrino oscillations, there is also evidence for oscillations at a Δm2 of about 1 eV2 from short-distance accelerator and reactor neutrino experiments2, 3, 4. However, it is not possible to explain this third Δm2 value with only three neutrino masses. Therefore, additional neutrino masses are required.
In their study, Kopp et al.1 tried fitting the world neutrino-oscillation data to theoretical models involving four different neutrino masses (three active neutrinos plus one sterile neutrino) and then five different neutrino masses (three active plus two sterile neutrinos; Fig. 1). They found that one sterile neutrino was insufficient to explain the world data, but two gave a satisfactory global fit. (Similar fits are discussed elsewhere5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.) One other feature of the authors' two-sterile-neutrino fit is that it allows for violation in leptons of the charge–parity (CP) symmetry — according to which particles and antiparticles behave like mirror images of each other — or for a difference between neutrino oscillations and antineutrino oscillations. Such CP violation might help to explain the r-process, in which heavy elements are produced through nuclear reactions involving rapid neutron capture (hence the 'r'), and the production of heavy elements in neutrino bursts from stellar explosions known as supernovae. It might also help to explain why the Universe is dominated by matter and not by an equal amount of matter and antimatter.
The supreme task of the physicist is to arrive at those universal elementary laws from which the cosmos can be built up by pure deduction. There is no logical path to these laws; only intuition, resting on sympathetic understanding of experience, can reach them
Monday, October 24, 2011
How many neutrinos should exist ?
The SM assumes three types of neutrinos. However, these authors analyzed data to demonstrate the need of two more types [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v478/n7369/full/478328a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20111020].
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment